Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Bird Flu Returns, and This Time It's Mutated

During the last couple of flu seasons, we were all worried about H1N1, a new and virulent strain of influenza, but this winter we may have to contend with a much deadlier foe: H5N1, or bird flu. Some Asian countries are reporting this week the first cases of a mutant strain of the virus spreading in poultry.

The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reported on Monday that the H5N1 virus has mutated, something that public health officials had feared would happen and that could possibly make the virus more dangerous to people.

In its original form, H5N1 primarily infects wild birds and poultry, including geese, chickens, ducks and turkeys, but only rarely jumps into people. Still, the fact that some people have become infected with H5N1 by eating improperly prepared and contaminated poultry — the virus has killed 331 people and infected 565 since it first appeared in 2003 — led experts to warn that it was only a matter of time before it altered into a form that made it easier to spread to humans.

It's not clear yet whether that has happened, but health authorities are concerned by the an new H5N1 variant spreading in poultry in both China and Vietnam; the new strain is resistant to current vaccines. In the years since H5N1 began spreading among bird and poultry flocks, millions of birds have been culled, and many countries have adopted vaccination programs to inoculate domestic fowl to prevent the spread of the virus. But six countries have continued to see H5N1 among their poultry population each year: Bangladesh, China, Egypt, India, Indonesia and Vietnam.

And after declining since a peak in cases in 2005-06, when some 4,000 cases were reported, the rate of H5N1 outbreaks among both animals and people has started to inch up this year. "When you look at 2011, there is a trend upward in cases," says Juan Lubroth, FAO's chief veterinary officer. "And in several countries that had experience with H5N1 already, they are seeing a new introduction of [the virus]. We want to alert the community that we are seeing an upswing of cases."

Already, Cambodia, which shares a border with Vietnam, has reported eight cases of H5N1 infection this year, and all have been fatal. It's not clear whether any of these involved the mutant strain, but experts say the more cases of infection among humans and birds there are, the more opportunities the virus has to recombine and mutate into a form that is more easily transmissible to people.

Containing the new H5N1 strain, known as H5N1 2.3.2.1, may be a challenge, since many of the infected fowl are wild species that migrate, and can easily spread the virus over thousands of miles. In the past two years, experts have tracked the original version of H5N1 to regions where it has never been reported before. It has also shown up again in places that had been virus-free for several years, including Israel, the Palestinian territories, Bulgaria, Romania, Nepal and Mongolia.

The same could happen with H5N1 2.3.2.1. "What has surprised us a bit is the geographical spread and also some concerns that the vaccine readily used in combating H5N1 is not as effective with this particular strain," says Lubroth. "There is a concern there, so we wanted to alert the world community."

http://healthland.time.com/2011/08/30/its-back-bird-flu-returns-and-this-time-its-mutated/

EU report reveals pesticides in organic food--2009

Below is a report published in July 2009 which will tell organic food is 100% safe or not? But notice this is an old report in 2009 on food collected in 2007.

An annual monitoring report found traces of pesticides in organic food products for the first time, challenging public perceptions that organic products are free of synthetic plant protection products.

96% of food samples analysed complied with the legal Maximum Residues Levels (MRLs) for pesticides and 4% exceeded them, according to the report, published on Thursday (9 July,2009) by the Parma-based European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

This year's results, which cover samples collected in 2007, compare favourably with 5% of samples which exceeded limits the previous year.

In total, residues of 354 different pesticides were found in measurable quantities in fruit and vegetables, while residues of 72 different pesticides were recorded in cereals.

For the vast majority (96%), the residue levels are considered within acceptable limits.

Maximum residue levels (MRLs) are generally-acceptable limits of pesticide deposits, which remain after fruit or vegetables are cleaned up and above which consumption in large quantities could present a risk for human health.

The report stresses that "in most cases the MRLs are well below the toxicologically acceptable residue levels," adding that "if a residue exceeds the MRL, it is not necessarily true that the consumer is at risk".

The report did not provide conclusions on the reasons for MRL surpluses, saying that reporting countries "should be encouraged to provide more detailed information in the future".

Organic food

A novelty in this year's report was that, for the first time, countries also provided Europe-wide data on pesticides in organic food.

While conventionally grown cereal, fruit and vegetables tend to exceed pesticide limits more frequently than organic food, the very presence of pesticide residue in the latter could raise eyebrows as these products are usually marketed as pesticide-free.

"It is true that pesticide residues were found on those samples too," said Ian Palombi, a communications officer at EFSA. However, he added that samples of organic fruit and vegetables had a generally lower rate of MRL surpluses (1.24% of all organic samples) in comparison to conventionally grown cereals, fruit and vegetables (3.99% of samples analysed).

The EFSA report underlines that no specific pesticide residue limits for organic products are currently established at EU level at this stage. For these products, the same levels as conventional products therefore apply, the report notes.

In addition, Palombi said that some EU countries were unable to report results for organic food due to "deficiencies in the data management system implemented at national level".

http://www.euractiv.com/en/cap/eu-report-reveals-pesticides-organic-food/article-183986

Friday, August 26, 2011

葫芦瓜情传百里












身边一位亲密的农友,一起到台湾考察有机农业,带了些大葫芦瓜种子回来试种,成功结了满藤果实,高兴的请我们去看瓜。瓜瓜还没落地,我们就采了几颗作桌上佳肴,据说味如瓠瓜,可惜我错过品尝。

大葫芦瓜在村里突然出现,风传数十里,引来新生活报记者采访,远在北马的爱瓜人,见报后包巴士来看瓜,拍照买瓜者皆有之。网友看不到真的葫芦瓜,在此看看照片,聊胜于无。


Tuesday, August 16, 2011

农业,真的是生意!

以下视屏所播放的短片,说明农业是可以生财的。
只要多动脑筋,就可以得到多一点收入。
慢慢欣赏吧!

https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=266769810015743&oid=149923991702377&comments


亞硝酸鹽超標無一合格‧浙江假血燕多來自大馬

2011-08-16

(中國杭州15日訊)浙江省工商局指出,目前浙江市場銷售的血燕不合格率達100%,其亞硝酸鹽的含量嚴重超標。

據初步調查,浙江市場上銷售的血燕產品多從廣東、廈門等地進入,主要源自馬來西亞等國家。

據悉,浙江工商部門共檢查血燕經銷商491多家,抽檢血燕537批次,並分別由浙江公正檢驗中 心、寧波出入境檢驗檢疫中心、溫州市工業科學研究院檢測中心等6家檢測機構進行檢測。截至目前,已經出具檢測報告303批次,而檢測結果則顯示,浙江市場 所售賣的血燕亞硝酸鹽含量普遍超標。

檢測發現,鷹皇牌燕之屋正基慶和堂等品牌血燕無一合格,其中鷹皇牌血燕的亞硝酸鹽含量高達11000毫克/千克,其他品牌血燕的亞硝酸鹽最高含量也超過了10000毫克/千克。

據浙江工商部門初步統計,此次抽檢涉及浙江省各零售店問題血燕達20萬克,約3萬多盞,平均亞硝酸鹽含量達4400毫克/千克。

據瞭解,亞硝酸鹽為一類無機化合物的總稱,主要指亞硝酸鈉,具有毒性,在一定條件下會轉化為致癌物質。

中國國家強制性標準《食品安全國家標準與食品添加劑使用標準》嚴格限制添加亞硝酸鹽,僅允許生產腌熏肉等製品有微量殘留,限量為30毫克/千克,最高熏製火腿殘留量也不得超過70毫克/千克。比照限量標準,此次抽檢的問題燕窩中的最高亞硝酸鹽含量已超過350倍之多。

(星洲日報)